b. 340
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before e2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 340-341
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur over the top voice must be a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). However, it may not be a common oversight, but an atypical example of a transfer of sign: a slur was printed under the notes instead of over them, although of the same range, which gave it a form of a tie of f1 (the engraver could have been encouraged to perform such a change by, e.g. lack of space under the notes). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 342-344
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
We suggest adding staccato signs in a similar context in bars 342 and 344 after the dots in the L.H. in bar 348 written in A. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 343
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we include the raising e2 to e2, added by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 344
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The dotted rhythm in A is the original version (cf. analogous bar 20), left here by Chopin, perhaps unintentionally. Therefore, the quavers in GE (→FE→EE) may be a result of Chopin's proofreading, although the absence of visible traces of performing changes in print allows us to consider a possible mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |