b. 331
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing dots extending the b-d1 third in FE may mean that they could have been added in the last phase of proofreading of GE1. The authenticity of this addition is questionable (same as of a similar change in EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 332
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 334
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The accent in A is clearly longer than the signs in, e.g. the previous two bars, yet in the editions it was reproduced as a short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 334
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the staccato dot in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be an oversight, corrected in GE2 on the basis of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 334
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A one can see a correction of the bottom note of the last crotchet in the L.H. Chopin initially wrote a b which he then reworked into a c1 and added names of both notes for the sake of clarity – c-g. According to us, it is probably a correction of an erroneously written version of the accompaniment (cf. bar 326) and not a change implying an improvement.
category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |