|
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The division of the slur is undoubtedly a result of a careless work of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 335-336
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add the slurs in the L.H. on the basis of the respective bars in the exposition. The slur in bar 336 was added already in GE1 (→FE), perhaps by Chopin. EE introduced double slurs, same as in the previous, analogous bars in the recapitulation. GE2 added a slur in bar 335 and removed the one in bar 336. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
For how to understand Chopin's rhythmic notation see bar 27. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 336
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The long accent on the 1st beat of the bar in A was reproduced in GE1 inaccurately, by shortening the sign and placing it closer to the 2nd beat of the bar. As a result, FE (→EE) include an accent on the 2nd beat of the bar, which is a mistake. GE2 corrected the placement of the sign, but not its length. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 337
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of c1 in the 1st crotchet in the L.H. is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE1→EE2). The mistake was noticed by the revisers of GE2 and EE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
