



b. 119
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing e2 on the penultimate quaver in the bar is almost certainly Chopin's mistake, corrected by him in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
b. 120
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit cautionary flats before d category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary flats before B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 124
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we give g
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 125-129
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the slur in the L.H. in bars 125-126, present in GE1 (→FE→EE), could have been added by Chopin. It is indicated by corrections of the slurs in the R.H. – if it were Chopin who ordered to combine the slurs in the R.H. at the transition between those bars, he could have also added a slur in the L.H., as if to emphasise that the one-bar slurs from bars 121-124 are no more valid here. EE added also a slur in bars 127-128 (after the slur the edition has in the R.H.). The slurring of both hands was homogenised also in GE2. In the main text we preserve the notation of A, since the slurs of EE and GE2 are certainly arbitrary, whereas the slur added in GE1, even if it comes from Chopin, is probably to be related to the corrections of the erroneous slurs in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |