



b. 126
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before e category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 126-127
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Breaking the slur between these bars is a characteristic inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (after all, the two-bar slur in bars 125-126 is already a result of proofreading – the remaining elements of original slurs show that each of these bars was most probably embraced with a separate slur). The continuous, four-bar slur written in A was restored in GE2. See also bars 128-129. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
|||
b. 128-129
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Ending the slur before the last note of this passage in unison is certainly an inaccuracy. Both changes to which the slur of A was subject in GE1 are deformations typical of the engraver of this edition – dividing a long slur and adjusting it to metric structures. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
No indication of the change of the leading instrumental group is almost certainly Chopin's oversight, caused by the transition to a new page in A. Four bars further, the composer marked an analogous change. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
b. 135
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to say what the c3 crotchet (grace note?), written in A over the d category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of A |