![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors resulting from corrections
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the 2nd half of the bar GE1 initially included an erroneous slur, running from the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
GE (→FE→EE) overlooked the dashes determining the range of diminuendo, which was rather a rule than an exception in the Concerto. The doubt about the placement of the rallentando indication, caused by a deletion in A, is of greater importance – it does begin after the 3rd beat of the bar, but also before the last beat. In the editions the first relation was included, yet in the main text we consider the second to be closer to Chopin's intention. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of A is, according to us, the only authentic text of this place. The sixth in GE (→FE→EE) is almost certainly a result of a misinterpretation of A – the engraver of GE1 considered the original ending of the stem of the g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , Annotations in FES |
||||||||
b. 81
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the editions the last note is written as a hemidemisemiquaver. Therefore, the group filling the 4th beat of the bar contains a fractional number of demisemiquavers – 8½ in GE1 and 9½ in FE (→EE), which must be regarded as a mistake. The engraver of GE1 probably shortened the last note, kind of "automatically" – cf. bar 41. The mistake was revised only in GE2, by reducing the value of the rest, which does not correspond to Chopin's original intention expressed in A. However, it could be that an additional beam was added in GE1 (→FE→EE) upon inspiration from Chopin, whereas leaving the rest without any changes was merely an oversight. In that situation, the version of GE2 would be a rational correction of an inaccurately performed proofreading of GE1. Such a possibility would be indicated by the overlooked '9' digit, determining the number of demisemiquavers in the group. The above analysis of the rhythm of the roulade's ending is binding regardless of the versions of its earlier part – see the previous note in this bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |