Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 10

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

..

In A (→GE1FE) there is no  lowering f to f. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected in EE and GE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 11-12

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Continuous slur in A (→GE)

Separate slurs in FE (→EE)

..

The separated slurs in FE (→EE) are most probably an inaccuracy repeated after the proof copy of GE1. In the very GE1 (→GE2) the slur was corrected (combined) in the last phase of proofreading, perhaps by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 12

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

Two-quaver slur in A

Four-quaver slur in GE1 (→FEEE)

Three-quaver slur in GE2

..

The two-quaver slur of A is most probably inaccurate (cf. similar figures in, e.g., the previous bars). Therefore, in the main text we give a longer slur, corresponding to the slurring of analogous figures. A similar solution was adopted in GE2. The half-bar slur of the remaining editions is certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

2 grace-note slurs in A

2 slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

Grace-note slur in GE2

..

The slur added in GE1 (→FEEE), clearly incompatible with the accompaniment's texture, is certainly erroneous, which contributed to it having been omitted by the reviser of GE2, who, above all, would check compliance with A. As far as A is concerned, one of two slurs combining the grace note with the note seems to be superfluous, however, Chopin could have wanted to show that the grace note concerns both voices on the 3rd beat of the bar.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II

..

In A, the original accompaniment on the 4th beat, crossed out but lisible, was like the figure on 3rd beat, shifted a second higher. See also note to bar 13.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Accompaniment changes