Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the clear slur of A is a typical example of the manner of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). In the main text we omit the additional slur over the quintuplet written in A – General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 295-296
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of A are not entirely clear; however, it is difficult to assume that Chopin would like to end a slur before resolving the suspension, particularly since a similar measure was present already in the previous bar. In spite of this, GE1 (→FE→EE) includes slurs embracing three notes only, which was corrected in GE2. In the main text we also add a slur in the analogous figure in bar 296. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the part of the R.H. A (→GE1→FE) has only one category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 296-297
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 297
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A there is no cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
, before the 2nd semiquaver. The necessary signs for the b2 and b3 notes were added in the remaining editions.
before d
3. The sign was added in