Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 253-255

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No L.H. slurs in A (→GE1FE)

2 slurs in EE

1 slur in GE2

..

The slurs in the L.H., added in EE and GE2, cannot be authentic, since Chopin did not participate in the creation of those editions. The need to add slurs in the L.H. could have been provoked by the slurs added in GE1 in bar 256.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 255-256

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

1 slur in A & GE2

2 slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

In GE1 (→FEEE) the slur is broken between the bars, in spite of the clearly combined slurs of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Corrections in A , GE revisions

b. 255-256

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No L.H. slur in A

2 slurs in bar 256 in GE1 (→FE)

3 slurs in EE

1 slur in GE2

..

A possibility that Chopin added such slurs in the L.H. in bar 256 in the proofreading of GE1 has to be firmly rejected. However, he could have added there the same slur as in the R.H., which was implemented by the engraver in a distorted form. It allows to confer a certain likeliness of authenticity on the slur of GE2. In the main text, we stick to the notation of A, since the need to perform the part of the L.H. with the same phrasing and articulation as in the R.H. is obvious here. The slurs of EE, being a completed version of the erroneous slurs of GE1 (→FE), are certainly arbitrary.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 255

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The traces of corrections, visible in GE1, prove that the slurs were initially divided on the bar line, which means that bars 254-256 were embraced – contrary to the clear notation of A – with three whole-bar slurs.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1

b. 256-257

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur only in bar 256 in A (literal reading→GEFEEE)

Slur to c1 in bar 257 in A (contextual interpretation)

..

In A it is unclear whether Chopin wanted to lead the slur only to the end of bar 256 or to the end of the solo part – a typical dilemma related to the transition to a new page. In the main text we adopt the second possibility, yet the version of the editions may be considered to be equal.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A