|
b. 200
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 208-209
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The shorter slur of GE is, according to us, inaccurate, which can be partially attributed to the sweeping slur of GC. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 209
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Due to the abbreviated notation of the recapitulation of Scherzo in the manuscripts, the state of the sources is same here as in bar 21. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 210-213
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we suggest adding the staccato signs and accents on the basis of respective bars of the initial section of Scherzo (bars 22-25). The abbreviated notation of the recapitulation in [A] (→GC) proves that Chopin wanted that the notation of both extreme sections was identical. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
As in bar 28, in the main text we give the notation in GC (→GE) which raises no reservations. The lack of accents in FE is certainly a mistake, and the mark in EE – most probably a long accent – a complement likely by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
1 in 
