



b. 220
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 220-222
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 220-222
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Due to the reasons discussed for the slurs of the L.H., we suggest the version with the ties of c category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 221
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Same as in bar 219, the absence of the c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 222-224
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur added – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) clearly shows that according to the composer's intention, it was not supposed to reach the next bar. The longer slur of EE may be considered in this situation an inaccurate interpretation of the slur added in the base text by Chopin (cf. bars 36-37) or an editorial revision on the basis of the analogous place of the first section of Scherzo. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Tenuto slurs |