|
b. 168
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC the bar is written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the previous one. At the same time, one can see that initially the bar was completely overlooked, whereas a relevant abbreviation was written as an addition. It cannot be excluded that the mistake (or unclear notation) was also in [A]. If so, Chopin had to write a respective addition also there, as FE contains the correct number of bars. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of A , Abbreviated notation of A , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC the part of the L.H. is in this bar marked in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the figure in the previous bar. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 172-177
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Both versions of the beginning of the slur may be authentic and they can be considered to be equal. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
|
b. 177-183
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the slurs of FE (→EE), more consistent, probably convey Chopin's notation in [A] more accurately than the slurs in GC. The latter are imprecise, so it is not obvious how they are meant to be understood, e.g., we interpret the beginning of the slur in bar 177 – differently than GE – as falling on the 2nd beat of the bar. It cannot be excluded that the slur beginning in bar 179 is supposed to be interpreted similarly. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
