



b. 154-156
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The missing staccato dots in FE (→EE) seem to be an oversight of the engraver. The second dot in GC (in bar 156) blends into the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 154
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
FE1 features C at the beginning of the bar, which is a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 158-159
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
On the basis of GC and FE it is hard to imagine what range and meaning the slur under the bottom voice of the R.H. is supposed to have. The sign in GC seems to be an articulation motivic slur starting under e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
b. 158-159
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The issue of sustaining the d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 158
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
It is hard to state which of the sources guessed the sense of the notation of [A] more accurately. It is highly likely that even seeing the autograph, we would not be sure how to assign the category imprint: Differences between sources |