|
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the wedge in FE (→EE) is most probably an oversight of the engraver. Anyways, Chopin's resignation from the sign seems to be highly unlikely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The bottom note of the 2nd quaver in FE1 is an erroneous e1, which was corrected already in FE2. The mistake, and in any case the inaccurately written note, must have been in [A], as in GC one can see an identical correction. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Alterations in GC |
|||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version of FE1 (→FE2→EE) – with d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
|
b. 40-41
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of accidentals on the 2nd and 3rd beat of bar 40 and 2nd beat of bar 41 in GC and FE1 (→FE2→EE1) is almost certainly Chopin's mistake. It is confirmed by naturals raising g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version of EE can be authentic; it should have been then considered to be a Chopin improvement. A possibility of Chopin intervention in this place is, however, reduced by the fact of leaving the mistakes in the part of the L.H. without correction – no naturals raising g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of EE |
1 in chord in 
in 
