GC
compare
The bottom note of the 2nd quaver in FE1 is an erroneous e1, which was corrected already in FE2. The mistake, and in any case the inaccurately written note, must have been in [A], as in GC one can see an identical correction.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, FE revisions, Alterations in GC
notation: Pitch