



Pedalling
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The pedalling in the 1st half of the bar may come from Chopin – it could have been added still in the base text to FE or added in a proofreading of this edition. However, it seems to be more likely that we are dealing with a mistake resulting from similarity of the first figures in the L.H. in bars 16-18. It is confirmed by a correction – deleting the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FES |
|||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
An earlier pedal release is the original concept, written in AT, AW and most probably in [A], which is proved by CDP and the sign written by the copyist in GC. The sign was then deleted by Chopin; the composer introduced a similar correction probably also in the base text to EE. Leaving in FE the earlier version may point to [A] as base text for this edition – Chopin corrected both copies in this place, yet not the autograph (however, it is not the only possible scenario). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The visible in GC deletions prove that the arrangement of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The visible in GC deletion proves that, same as in bar 24, Chopin considered the arrangement of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »