Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The pedalling in the 1st half of the bar may come from Chopin – it could have been added still in the base text to FE or added in a proofreading of this edition. However, it seems to be more likely that we are dealing with a mistake resulting from similarity of the first figures in the L.H. in bars 16-18. It is confirmed by a correction – deleting the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FES |
||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
Before the 8th semiquaver, CDP, GC (→GE) and EE have a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FES |
||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The notation of this bar is erroneous or inaccurate in the majority of the sources. Most probably, Chopin, writing this fragment in [A] for the third time (after analogous bars 6 and 25), had already such a strong correlation of the notes with the proper sound that he did not notice the missing
The cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors of GC |
sign – in 
returning b
1. This characteristic for Chopin error was corrected in later sources; 
in this place, which was corrected by Chopin in 
