|
b. 119-120
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Nothing indicates that the delayed start of slur In FE and GE could be authentic. The engravers or revisers possibly tried to avoid beginning a slur on a tied note. In case of GE, the inauthentic slur could have resulted from the inaccurate notation of GC wherein bar 120 starts a new line with a slur running from the first note, therefore as in GE. However, this does not justify omitting the clearly written opening fragment of the slur in bar 119. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 119
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The EE version results almost certainly from an oversight of dots extending the minims in the lower part of the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 119
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
EE overlooked a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 120
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In GC (→GE) and EE there are no dashes determining the range of the ritenuto indication, while in FE the entire indication. These are most likely oversights. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In EE, GE and FE1 (→FE2) there is no tie sustaining the g note to the next bar. FE3 corrected this inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , FE revisions |
raising b
to b.
