Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Fingering
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Fingering

b. 1

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Fingering in A

FE (→GE,EE)

..

Chopin completed the fingering of the basic figure while proofreading FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 1-10

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

Fingering in A

FE (→GE)

..

The omission of '1' at the end of bars 1 and 9 in FE (→GE) could be blamed on the engraver's distraction and considered as the notation's inaccuracy, if it was not for a simultaneous addition of '2' at the end of bars 2-3. According to us, regardless of the reason for omitting these digits, the final effect of the changes in FE must be accepted as deliberate and valid. Allegedly, Chopin assumed that the hand position in bars 1-2 is not as important as in bars 3-4.

In EE the addition by Fontana in bar 1 complies with the fingering written by Chopin in A, yet in bars 9-10 – it does not.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 2

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

No fingering in A (→FEGE)

Fingering in EE

..

In EE Fontana employed a supplemented version of Chopin's fingering from bar 4.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 3

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

No fingering in A

Fingering in FE (→GE,EE)

..

While proofreading FE, Chopin added the fingering of the L.H. in bars 3-4, particularly '3' over the first sustained a in bar 3. As, according to the benchmark fingering given in bar 1, the last semiquaver in bar 2 should be played with the 4th finger, such a notation could suggest a swap of the finger on this note. According to us, there is, however, a more plausible explanation for this notation – Chopin added the fingering in bar 3 before he decided to change the ending of bar 2, i.e. the 3rd finger at the beginning of bar 3 was added in the moment when the note was being struck and not held. Therefore, in the main text we propose to move the digit to bar 2, which was included in the neighbouring note.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 3

composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor

No fingering in A

Fingering in FE (→GE,EE)

Fingering written into FES, interpretation

Our variant suggestion

..

The fingering in the L.H. was added by Chopin during a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). Chopin suggests here a different, slightly more demanding finger arrangement than at the beginning of the piece.
Probably it turned out to be too difficult for Jane Stirling, as in her pupil's copy (FES) digits suggesting use of a more convenient fingering were added. According to us, the entry, despite including only two digits, changes the fingering in the entire bar (perhaps this is what the sharp over the fingering reminds of?), which we also suggests in the main text in the variant form.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Authentic corrections of FE