Slurs
|
b. 20-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The slur over the motif in the R.H. in bars 22-23 was probably added by Chopin at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the lack of a similar addition over the first motif is an inaccuracy of notation, hence in the main text we suggest a suitable addition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In FE (→EE) the lower tie and slur were omitted, certainly by mistake. The error was corrected in GE. Cf. bar 62. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin most probably added the R.H. slur at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 20-23. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A there are visible traces of changes in the slurring in the L.H. The original slurs generally embraced four notes: category imprint: Interpretations within context; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we suggest to add the slur in the L.H. Leaving without the slur only bar 27 may have resulted from graphic difficulties in FE (→GE), similarly as embracing with a slur only the end of the bar in A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
