Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
A has G as the 2nd note in the L.H., same as in the remaining analogous bars. However, the note is written a little bit too low, which probably resulted in its interpretation as F in FE (→EE3). This almost patent error was corrected in GE and EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We add a few cautionary accidentals: a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In FE (→EE) the lower tie and slur were omitted, certainly by mistake. The error was corrected in GE. Cf. bar 62. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The rhythmic value of the chord in FE – a minim – is probably erroneous, as in the 2nd half of the bar there is no relevant rest. The error was corrected both in EE (by adding a rest) and GE (by changing the minim to a semibreve). In the main text we give the latter, compliant with the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
before e
before g and 
