Issues : GE revisions

b. 1

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

in A

in FE1

in FE2

in GE

in EE3

in EE4

..

In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See the Etude in C major, No. 1, bar 1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

in A, GE & EE4

in FE (→EE3)

..

A has as the 2nd note in the L.H., same as in the remaining analogous bars. However, the note is written a little bit too low, which probably resulted in its interpretation as in FE (→EE3). This almost patent error was corrected in GE and EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 17-18

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

..

We add a few cautionary accidentals: a  before e in bar 17 and a  before and  before b in bar 18. The natural was already added in GE2 (→GE3GE4) and EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 22

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

2 slurs & 2 ties in A & GE

Slur & tie in FE (→EE)

..

In FE (→EE) the lower tie and slur were omitted, certainly by mistake. The error was corrected in GE. Cf. bar 62.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 24

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

Semibreve in A & GE

Minim in FE (→EE)

..

The rhythmic value of the chord in FE – a minim – is probably erroneous, as in the 2nd half of the bar there is no relevant rest. The error was corrected both in EE (by adding a rest) and GE (by changing the minim to a semibreve). In the main text we give the latter, compliant with the notation of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions