b. 86-87
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic slurring of PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 86-87
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
We give the slurring of PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 86
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the notation of PE, as from the formal point of view it is error-free and may correspond to the notation of [A]. The notation of JC and EF, however, seems to be more logical:
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 86
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The indication sempre legato, visible in PE, is most probably authentic; juxtaposing such a kind of indications with slurs is characteristic of Chopin's notation. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 86-87
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider the dynamic hairpins of PE. Their simultaneous use with verbal indications, which apparently bear the same meaning, is characteristic for Chopin. The signs generally refer to the changes of melodic line, whereas verbal indications – to the entire sound; therefore, they can differ in their range and even in the direction of the indicated change. Cf. the note concerning bar 64. category imprint: Differences between sources |