Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 82

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

Chord with in JC & EF

Chord without in PE

..

In the main text we give the chord without the note, as it is in PE. Chopin, as was characteristic of him, achieves here a more transparent sound by reducing the number of notes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 83-85

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No slurs in JC & EF

Slurs in PE

..

The slurs that we give in the main text are present only in PE. Similarly as in the case of the slurs in the L.H., their authenticity does not raise any doubts.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 83

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No mark in JC & EF

Accent in PE

..

The long accent of PE, characteristic for Chopin, is one of a number of elements confirming the authenticity of this source.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 83

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No signs in JC & EF

 in PE

..

In the main text we give the  signs in bars 83 and 85 drawn from PE. Highlighting the ascending movement of seconds with a  sign in order to emphasise an expressively important chord or a note was an often used ploy by Chopin in, e.g., the Prelude in A minor, Op. 28 No. 2, bars 15-16.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

b. 83-85

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No indications in JC

cresc. in EF

cresc. in PE

..

Aside from small differences in positioning the indication poco a poco crescendo, EF and PE describe here (and also in the next bars) the same dynamic change in a compatible manner.

category imprint: Differences between sources