b. 81-90
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE, the L.H. two-note chords in bars 81-82 and 89-90 are not divided into two separate voices. Similarly in bars 423-424 and 431-432. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of any of those two versions; it is however impossible to find out whether at a certain moment Chopin replaced one of them with the other. We give precedence to the version of GC (→GE) and FE, as it produces a fuller rhythmic analogy with bars 82-83. The same applies to the analogous bar 428. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Missing in FE is the sharp raising a1 to a sharp1. This is probably an accidental omission. The same applies to bar 429. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We consider it very likely that the notation of the sources is not accurate here. It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between the two types of accents most often used by Chopin even when one has the autograph at their disposal. We suggest a long accent, as in the similar bar 81. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
EE has a cautionary before a1. A publisher's revision cannot be ruled out. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |