data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 20
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 20
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing dot in FE must be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 20
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The three staccato dots are poorly visible in A, yet there is no doubt about their presence and significance. The absence of the marks in GE (→FE,EE,IE) is due to inadvertence of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A the ending of the slur in bar 23 (at the end of the line) indicates that it should be continued, which is not confirmed by bar 24, in which there is no ending thereof. To the main text we adopt the interpretation of GE (→FE,EE,IE) due to category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness |
|||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |