mUltimate Chopin

(Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 15

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

in A

 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)
..

In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the  indication was wrongly reproduced as , which happened a number of times in Chopin's pieces.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , fz – f

b. 15

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

at beginning of bar in A & IE

 before e1 minim in GE (→FE,EE)
..

Moving  to the 2nd crotchet in the bar was probably an inaccuracy by the engraver of GE (→FE,EE). According to us, the fact that the mark in IE is placed in accordance with A is due to another inaccuracy, this time by the engraver of IE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE ,

b. 16

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

2 slurs in A, literal reading

Continuous slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

No slurs, our alternative suggestion
..

There are a few ways to interpret the two lines visible in A under the R.H. quavers, as illustrated by the suggested variants. The version of the editions can be considered an interpretation of the A notation – it is likely that the first line, bolder, was meant to continue the second one so that together they constitute a six-quaver slur. The reflection on the function of these slurs, which are, after all, only a supplement to the continuous slur led over the notes, leads to the following interpretation possibilities:

  • The slurs are to indicate the internal figuration structure. This would be an argument for the version with two slurs, as a 6-quaver structure cannot be applied further on.
  • The slurs were Chopin's first take on slurs, which he then abandoned by adding the top, several-bar long slur. Examples of such unfinished corrections can be found in mov. I of the Sonata, e.g. in bar 179.

In the main text we provide two slurs, which are closest to the actual notation. The version of the editions can be considered an alternative interpretation, whereas the version without slurs – an acceptable variant. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 16

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  to f1. Chopin wrote a respective accidental only just in the next bar.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 16

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No slur in A

Slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE)
..

In the main text we include the slur added in GE (→FE,EE,IE) – Chopin's inadvertence is evidenced by the slurs in the corresponding places in analogous bars 17-19.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions