b. 239-240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The range of the A slur is uncertain – in bar 239, at the end of a line, the slur suggests that it should be continued, yet in bar 240 there is no ending thereof. As was the case with the R.H. slur, we interpret the ending of the slur as reaching the end of the passage (the c1 crotchet), and this is the slur we provide in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Uncertain slur continuation , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Due to the diminuendo in the next bar, the longer GE mark (→FE,EE,IE) could be considered more natural, in the main text we reproduce the hairpin after A. Practically speaking, this difference is hardly of consequence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 239
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 240-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Chopin extended the A slur for it to reach the f2 crotchet. Therefore, the version of the editions resulted from a totally unjustified arbitrary decision by the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
||||||||
b. 240-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing e2-f2 slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE) is either an oversight or a revision – making one's work easier by omitting a slur on the stave, which requires greater precision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |