Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We recreated the accent and category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Vertical accents , GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The interpretation of accents in A is particularly difficult in that bar, as neither the graphic analysis nor the stylistic one provide convincing arguments for considering them as long or short. It can only be stated that it most probably concerns 2 identical accents. GE and FE have short accents, while the second one is under the G note. EE has a vertical accent, only on the last note. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Vertical accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 35-48
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We adopt the unambiguous staccato dots of A (→GE) and EE (EE is lacking the 1st dot in bar 37). FE's wedges may be an arbitrary revision of the edition and they do not have to result from distinct notation of the manuscript which serves as its base text – in that edition the dots are used only with the slurs in bars 122-126. The absent signs in FE in bars 37, 42 and 44 are probably a result of an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The clearly long accent in A was recreated as a short in GE. A short accent is also in FE. In EE the accent sign was omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The accent in A is undoubtedly long. In all editions it was rendered as short. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
after 
