Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 638-640
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accents is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1) – bar 638 opens a new line of text, which would often cause distraction and defects of various kind. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 640-641
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 189, of which the discussed bar is an exact repetition, in the main text we add category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 640-641
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 641-644
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The visibly incomplete slurring of GE1 (→GE2) probably reflects one of the original versions of the slurs in FE, changed then in the last phase of proofreading. The slur added in GE3 constitutes a natural addition, in particular in the face of the authentic slurring of six previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 641-644
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE1), there are no accents. In GE1 (→GE2 as well as in EE2 and EE3), a mark was added in bar 641, while in GE3 also in the next three. In the main text, we deem the additions in GE3 to be legitimate. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
in 
in 
