Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 654-657
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the cresc. indication added by Chopin in FC along with the dashes marking its range within b. 654-663. Just like in b. 203-212, the dashes were overlooked in GE1 and added in GE2 (→GE3) while modifying the initial section of crescendo after analogous b. 71-72: cresc. was moved to b. 655, and a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 655
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the R.H. part, there are no accidentals in the 2nd half of the bar in FE. The necessary sharps were added in GE and EE (in EE1, only before the 7th semiquaver). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The cautionary sharps before the 1st octave in the L.H. were removed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the only authentic notation of the ornament, written in A. However, we accept the notation of GE2 (→GE3), since it almost certainly marks the same performance. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
& cresc. - - - in 
raising g2 to g
2, which was completed in 
