Issues : Errors in EE
|
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
Two long accents visible in A were reproduced in FE (→EE; in EE2 the accent in bar 7 was overlooked) in varied ways. GE includes short accents in both bars. There is no reason to assume that Chopin interfered with any of the versions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In EE1 it is b that is the lowest note of the minim chord. This patent mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 14, Prelude in E♭ minor
..
Before the R.H. penultimate quaver Chopin wrote in A a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 7-9
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
EE is lacking dynamic indications. It must be an omission, as it concerns the entire line of the text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
EE2 does not have the accent added in EE3 (→EE4) together with staccato dots under the quavers (probably by analogy with bar 15). In GE a short accent was applied and moved over the crotchet. In the main text we preserve the notation of A (→FE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Placement of markings , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
-c
which he crossed out after having checked it was not essential. This proves the intended pitch to be c
