



Issues : Accidentals in different octaves
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE is missing a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 140
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A e and a in the L.H. and e1 and a2 in the R.H., the pitch of which is unquestionable due to the harmonic context, are devoid of the necessary accidentals. All the omitted naturals were added in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
A (→GC,FE1→FE2) has no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
There are no accidentals before the 4th and 8th semiquavers in FE (→EE,GE). The natural put before c4, the last note in the bar, proves that Chopin considered the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The absence of a mordent both in EE and GE suggests that we are dealing with an oversight of the engraver of FE, which made its way to these editions; however, in FE it was corrected in the last stage of proofreading. In the main text we add an accidental – often omitted by Chopin in such situations – specifying the pitch of the mordent's top note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |