|
b. 566
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing 2nd fingering digit is most probably a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 566
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing arpeggio signs are most probably a mistake of the engraver of FE, who could have confused the bar with one of the previous ones, similar b. 562 or 564. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 567
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A comma-like mark in GC, which here should be read as a wedge, was not - maybe by chance - included in GE. Neither EE nor FE have any mark in this place. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 567
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 567
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The entry of FEH defines a different arrangement of fingers with repetitions of the initial figure than the one indicated by Chopin at the beginning of the bar. In accordance with what was said in the previous note, this arrangement seems to be more natural. In EE, Fontana gives only the fingering of the ending of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
in 
