Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 540-541

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In EE the slur begins as early as in b. 541, close to its beginning even though there are no notes (no even rest) there.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: EE inaccuracies

b. 540-565

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

in EE

#in GC (→GE)

in FE

..

No continuation of the dashed line determining the scope of cresc. ​on the new page in FE (from b. 542) must be an error. The replacemnent of a typical abbreviation with a full word split into syllables is a characteristic revison of EE. In the main text we present the GC (→GE) version.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 540

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Chord in sources (4 notes)

Our alternative suggestion (3 notes)

..

According to us, the use of a three-note chord is also acceptable here, like in the analogous bar of exposition.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 540-555

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

category imprint:

b. 540

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

..

In the analogous bar of exposition (bar 185), a different finger was written down in FEH, third. Both fingering options are convenient, yet the 3rd finger seems to be more natural in the context of the next chord.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH