|
b. 374
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
As was the case with the preceding chord, Chopin's oversight seems much more likely than an intentional omission of the arpeggio. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 374
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 375-398
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC bars 375-432 are notated in an abbreviated form. Instead of notes there are digits written out corresponding to numbered bars 33-90. In b. 375, as an example, G category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the ten. marking in FE may result from misinterpretation of the beginning of an abbreviated notation in [A2] (it is most probable that Chopin used the same abbreviation as in [A1]). In a corresponding b. 33 the marking is found FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We believe that both the short accent in EE and hairoin in GE result from misunderstanding of the base text notation. In the main text we present a long accent based on GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
raising b
to b was overlooked. The manifest error was left uncorrected in 
1-G
in 