



b. 370-372
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC undisputable notation. No accent in b. 372 is an obvious omission in EE, and long accents in GE result form not thorough enough analysis of the GC notation (the difference in accents lenghth in bars 360-368 and 370-374 was overlooked). Double accents in FE may have come form a reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , FE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 370-371
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, all omitted and shortened accents in GE and FE are random inaccuracies. Moving the accents closer to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 370-376
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||||
b. 370
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In FE, the slur ends on the last note of bar 370, despite its continuation on the new line. It must be a mistake of the engraver. In EE and GE, the ending of the slur was extended – a revision we deem accurate – cf. analogous bars 230-231. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 370
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |