|
b. 606-610
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The #E - without slurs - most probably copies the initial stage of the noatation of motifs of LH in bars 606 and 609-610. In the main text we present the consistent notation of slurs in GC (→GE) and FE. Cf. bars 573-574 and 577-578. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606-620
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
For the main text we adopt cresc. - - - based on GC (→GE). In EE it is divided into syllables (it is the common manner of EE) and extends further only to abruptly end without the last syllable "do" - in b. 615, which is the last on the page. The placement of the first two syllables in bars 606 i 613 suggests that the whole indication should extend as far as b. 620. In FE there is no marking at all, which is most probably Chopin's omission while writing hastily [A2] (cf. annotation to b. 373) category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the last note in the R.H. is a semiquaver, which is inconsistent with the demisemiquaver rest that precedes it. We correct this mistake in an obvious manner by shortening that note to a demisemiquaver. In GE and EE, the place was revised in the same way. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||||||
|
b. 606-607
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 23-24, in FE (→EE) this pair of bars was replaced with a double bar with a two-bar rest marked with the digit 2. In GE1 the bars were not combined, yet in each of them both rests were provided with the digits 1. In the main text we preserve the notation of A (→FC), restored also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 607-611
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In bars 607 and 611 in EE, there are (short) accents both in the LH and RH parts. It is uncertain that such a version is authentic (cf. 606-620). The accents in GC (marked in bars 575 and 579) may be interpreted both as long or short. In GE they were read as short ones. For the main text we adopt the long accents of FE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
