Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 361-363

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, only some of the g notes (in various octaves) are provided with necessary naturals – G and g2 in bar 361 and G-g in bar 363 (Chopin would often repeat accidentals before tied notes, which we do not apply in our transcriptions – see General Editorial Principles). All necessary accidentals were already added both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 361

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fontana's fingering in EE

Fontana's fingering in EE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 361-363

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No fingering in FE (→GE)

..

In each of these bars (as well as in bar 360), Fontana marked in EE a finger swap on the G notes – from first to fifth in bars 360 and 362 and from fifth to first in bars 361 and 363. Such a fingering is a natural consequence of holds of those notes, carefully marked by Chopin; however, the fingering's function is not limited to the realisation of the octave sound of the bass note, which, e.g. in bars 362-363, is already guaranteed by the pedalling. Finger swaps on tied notes provide for a convenient and secure grip of the played notes (g and G1), which allows the performer to concentrate on the virtuoso passages in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 361-364

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur to bar 364 in A (→FEEE) & GE2 (→GE3)

Slur to end of bar 360 in FC (→GE1)

..

The missing ending of the slur in a new line must be a mistake of the copyist. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3), most probably on the basis of analogy with b. 463-466.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 361

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

in A

No  in GE (→FE,EE,FESB)

..

The omission of the  hairpin coupled with the cresc. indication was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions