|
b. 581-582
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in the previous bars, an additional slur under the L.H. part is not necessary in this layout. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 582
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→EE), the sharp is placed over the grupetto mark. The patent mistake was corrected in GE by removing the erroneous mark. In the main text, we move the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEJ , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is probably erroneous – cf. analogous bar 232. In the main text, we preserve the nominal rhythmic values of the original version, whereas in GE3 the 1st note was prolonged to a crotchet, which may be considered an alternative reconstruction of the rhythm intended by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 583
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the extended version of semiquaver figures given in the edition of the Concerto edited by Mikuli (see bar 153) as a 'Chopinesque variant.' However, it is uncertain whether the egualmente indication and the fingering are also authentic – the fact that, e.g. not all fingerings come from Chopin is openly discussed by Mikuli in the preface to his edition: '[...] the fingering of the edition comes largely from Chopin; wherever this is not the case, it is at least written according to his rules [...].'* * "[...] der Fingersatz dieser Ausgabe grossentheils von Chopin selbst herrührt, wo dies aber nicht der Fall, wenigstens seinen Grundsätzen entsprechend notirt ist [...]" category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 585-590
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC slurring. Literal reading of the slurs extending over the bar line (bars 588-589) suggests continuation. Such is the interpretation of GE and there is an identical slur in EE. However, we believe that Chopin intended here a new slur from b. 589, similarly to what we find in FE category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
in 
2 as the bottom note of the grupetto seems to be more natural than c2, and the intended mark (
