|
b. 363-364
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 364
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, the missing accent in A (→GE→FE) must be considered an inaccuracy; Chopin wrote accents in all 16 analogous figures (bars 178-183, 258, 260, 354-362 and 495-501). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 364
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The mistake of FE (→EE) is proved by a comparison with analogous bars 363 and 367-368 (see also bars 39-40) as well as by the orchestral part, in which in oboe I there is an a2 and not g2. The revision of GE was most probably based on the aforementioned analogy. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 364
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the wedge was arbitrarily changed to a staccato dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 364
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Single fingering digits in FED and EE complement the Chopinesque indications contained in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
to the 4th quaver in bar 363 (e2) and to the last crotchet in bar 364 (a). Moreover, Chopin did not write a cautionary 
to b
at the beginning of bar 363. All the accidentals were added in 
