|
b. 458
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot featured in GE instead of wedge is probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 458
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Contrary to the previous two bars, the missing mark cannot be considered a patent oversight. In spite of a similar figure in the L.H. part, the bar performs a different function within the four-bar section (bars 456-459) than the remaining three – while the previous two bars are independent units with a clear climax in the middle of the bar, the third one is a part of a two-bar structure and it prepares its climax falling at the beginning of the fourth one. In turn, the accent in the fourth bar emphasises a new note, signalling the change of harmony and transition into the next phrase. Therefore, in the main text we leave the version without accent; we suggest adding it only in an alternative version. The accent was added also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 458-459
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest a wedge over both quavers in these bars, in accordance with the markings present in the majority of similar places. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 459-461
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In subsequent passages, Fontana's fingering resembles the scheme indicated by Chopin in bar 457. The indications written in FEH are of the same nature. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 459
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
