|
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
|
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In FE1 (→FE2) there are no ledger lines on the 2nd semiquaver of the 5th and 6th R.H. triplets. The noteheads are actually at the right pitch, yet the notation is misleading, particularly in the case of a2, which can be easily mistaken for a g2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 328
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As was the case with the 5th triplet in bar 325, here the 3rd triplet is presented in AsI in its initial form. In both places Chopin eventually opted for a more regular form of the figuration. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Main-line changes |
|||||
|
b. 328-329
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Leading the slur to bar 329 almost certainly resulted from a misinterpretation of A by the GE engraver. In A this place is below bars 320-321, and the L.H. part G1-A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 328
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the beginning of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
1 slur present there could be considered an extension to the discussed R.H. slur in bar 328.
in 