|
b. 323-324
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In EE1 the ties to the L.H. chord were overlooked, which also contributed to a pitch mistake, as the bottom note of the chord in bar 324 is devoid of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we omit the cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 324
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FEH, the fingering digits for the 5th and 4th last semiquavers – 1-2 – are written twice, with different pencils. Since it was the same digits that were written twice, it seems that the person who was writing them for the second time did not notice the notation or wanted to enhance its legibility. In both cases, one of the writing persons could have been Chopin, hence we include those digits in the main text. The fingering digit given for the 9th semiquaver in EE is most probably erroneous – we are almost certainly talking about the 2nd finger and not third, as the digit '2' should be understood in the English system of marking fingers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Annotations in FEH |
. The ties were added in 
in 
before d
2. It may be a remaining element of an earlier orthography of the previous triplet, in which the top notes were written as d2, same as in bar 320.
