|
b. 624
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In an identical figuration four bars later, Fontana indicated only the fingering of the quavers in the bottom voice. However, he most probably meant the same fingering in both places. Its authenticity remains unconfirmed, like the majority of Fontana's indications. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 624
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 625-626
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur in GE results from an erroneous interpretation of the slightly inaccurate notation of FE – the slur in bar 625, the last one in a line of text, suggests continuation with its shape but not range. However, the slur in bar 626 leaves no doubts that it is a continuous slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 625-626
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FED one can see two diagonal lines, written with a flourish. Their significance remains a mystery, although one of them could be interpreted as a mark emphasising the meaningful coherence of the chords in these bars. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
|||||
|
b. 626-635
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accents in bars 626, 630 and 635 are most probably a result of oversights of the engraver of FE or of Chopin in [A]. In the main text, we add the missing accents like all the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
