mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 620

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

8 staccato dots in FE (→EE)

9 dots in GE
..

The additional dot in GE seems to be a routine addition of the engraver, convinced of the mark having been overlooked in FE. On the other hand, such an oversight cannot be excluded. In the main text, we stick to the version of the principal source – FE, which is also supported by the fact that the articulation of the final demisemiquaver results from the rhythmic context and does not require specification.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 620

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a digit defining the rhythmically homogeneous irregular group, in accordance with the layout of the quavers in the L.H.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 621

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

D-E in EE

G1-C in GC (→GE) & FE
..

In EE the first two quavers - D-E - judging by the identical notation of the other sources are erroneously written. It needs to be said as well that there is an error in the notation of the second quaver of the bar in GC that may mislead a reader as it is E written out with a ledger line.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors of GC

b. 621

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No mark in EE and FE

Staccato dot in GC (→GE)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 621-622

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Beginning of the slur in EE

Contextual interpretation of GC (→GE)

FE
..

The slur in EE erroneously begins only in b. 624. We may suspect that the omission of the slur's beginning until the end of the line mast have occured already in the manuscript for the edition. Also the GC slur may well be inaccurate, so we assume based on GE that the slur is too long and should apply to where the RH comes in. For the main text we adopt the FE slur which seems to be musically most natural. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC