|
b. 453
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The type of accents used by Chopin does not unambiguously result from the notation of FE – the marks are longer than the definitely short accents (e.g. in bars 474-476) and placed slightly after the notes, which may be an argument for long accents. In the main text, we give short accents, since they seem to be more natural in this context. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 453
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 454
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 454-462
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 454-455
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of a staccato mark in A in bar 454 must be an inaccuracy, corrected already in GE (→FE→EE), where a dot was added. A dot is visible also in bar 453, yet it may also be an inaccuracy, resulting from, e.g. haste – cf. bars 414-415. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Wedges |
restoring g2 on the 3rd beat of bars 454 and 462 in 
