data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
The placement of the dynamic marking in FE (→EE1) – before the 2nd triplet in the bar – suggests a mistake. The Chopinesque proofreading entry could have been misinterpreted; it could have been
or even
if the original
was overlooked in the proof copy. In the first case, the composer's intention would be
, which we include as an additional possibility. According to us, a possible change of the correctly printed
to
is highly unlikely.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Verbal indications