mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 298

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Wedge in A

Dot in GE1 (→FE)

Dots in EE & GE2
..

Reproducing the wedge over d1 as a dot must be an inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). In turn, the dot for the L.H., added in EE and GE2, is a revision of the editors.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 298

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

We add cautionary flats before d and d1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 298

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 298

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

The fingering digit, written in FED between the staves, could also refer to d1 in the R.H., which is, however, much less likely from the pianistic point of view.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 298

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The traces of proofreading in print, visible in FE, allow us to state that the penultimate semiquaver was initially a b1. It was most probably the original version, since it seems to be highly unlikely that the note could have been printed by mistake.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE