mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 295

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No sign in FE (→GE,EE1→EE2)

 in EE3
..

The mark in EE3 was added undoubtedly under the influence of analogous bar 311, in which, however, the dynamic marks are generally different (even contradictory on the 3rd beat of the bar), and nothing suggests that Chopin would have accepted the possibility of compiling them.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 295

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before c2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 295

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No indication in FE (→GE,EE)

a tempo on EE2 (→EE3)

[a tempo] suggested by the editors
..

We suggest adding an a tempo indication (like it is in analog. bar 143), which must have been overlooked by the engraver of FE or by Chopin himself. It was added also by the reviser of EE2 (→EE3). 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 295

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No indication in FE (→GE,EE)

[] suggested by the editors
..

We suggest adding a ​​​​​​​ marking like it is in analog. bar 143.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 295

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No teaching fingering

Fingering written into FEH
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH