|
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing arpeggio is most probably an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver of FE1. The sign was added by EE2 after comparing it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A this bar ends a page and does not contain a slur. However, in the next bar Chopin wrote an ending of a slur reaching the 1st note and started a new one from the 2nd note. This undoubtedly proves that the absence of a slur in the discussed bar must be considered a mistake, hence in the main text we add the overlooked fragment of the slur, starting from the last minim, which seems most natural due to the change of register of the minim chord sequence. This is how this notation was interpreted in GE, while EE2 added the slur after GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||
|
b. 293
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The earlier starting point of the slur in GE (→FE,IE) is either a routine revision, adjusting a slur to a rhythmic group (in this case a bar), or an inaccuracy. The EE version could have resulted from a misinterpretation of the GE slur, and its compliance with the A notation is almost certainly accidental. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before e category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1 in 
before d