|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slurs from a & c |
suggested by the editorsAccording to us, the majority of the sources led the slur up to b. 297 in order to clearly mark the fragment of A, heavily crossed out. A comparison with analogous b. 274, 376 & 397 proves that Chopin considered a slur reaching b. 296 to be enough, and this is the one we give in the main text. It was also the crossings-out that were probably the reason for the missing slur in the L.H., which we hence add. The differently led slurs of GE2 (→GE3), which repeated the erroneous slurs of GE1 from b. 274-275, cannot be justified, in terms of both sources and music.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: GE revisions, Inaccuracies in A
notation: Slurs